Supremes to rule on gun ban, again.

[RED]

Nothing about this has been batted around. Just a small article on a Chicago TV station

http://cbs2chicago.com/local/chicago.gun.lawsuit.2.1217885.html

:icon_scratch:

[JB White]

Guns aren't techically banned in Chicago. Registered guns are still allowed. Gun registration is however closed to all but LEO's and certain elite.
Besides, nobody needs a gun in Chicago. All you have to do is dial 9-1-1 and wait 20 minutes. Then a single car shows up and asks what the problem is.

No joke. I beat the guy with a #2 shovel and sent him running bloody 19 minutes before the Police responded to my son's 9-1-1 call. He was only 14 at the time and I told him to RUN according to the 'duty to retreat' law. Not that I was being law abiding mind you. I didn't want him hurt.
Didn't matter that he reported a break-in and there was a fight in progress. I won because he was trying to hurt us and I was pissed off enough that I was probably trying to kill him.

[John Sukey]

At least I know how Ginsberg and Sotomayor are going to vote.:rolleyes:

[Vern Humphrey]

Anybody know how many whole horses there are on the Supreme Court? I count at least two horses' patoots.;)

[kcw]

Just tuned in the the local radio station for the news. they ran a short piece on this issue which included a few words from a spokesman with the Brady bunch.
The Brady rep seemed to be more than a bit down at the mouth, saying that his side was facing a tough fight before SCOTUS. I found this to be a strange attitude as generally a spokesperson will be all smiles and postive, even when they're up to their eyeballs in trouble.

[jsaviano]

Another 5-4 ruling; we win. If we do win I wonder if it will have any bearing on Massachusetts crazy gun laws?:1948:

[Embalmer]

it should.... I hope http://www.smileyvault.com/albums/character/smiley-vault-character-009.gif