PDA

View Full Version : O'Bummer Gun Control Efforts Slapped Down by Congress



Louis of PA
12-30-2011, 04:29
It takes the right kind of congress critters, along with our associations, to watch out for this stuff. Otherwise, these things will be snuck into new laws and we'll only find out the hard way.
Louis of PA

Firing back at gun control
Congress muzzles federal funds used to weaken the Second Amendment
By Emily Miller
-
The Washington Times
December 22, 2011

"The Obama administration's anti-gun agenda ... was blasted by Congress last week. Republicans used the $1 trillion omnibus bill for 2012 to shoot back at the sneaky use of federal funds for gun control.

"One sentence in the 2,100-page spending bill stopped taxpayers' money from being used for sham studies designed to make legal gun ownership seem like a public health hazard. The House GOP included a provision in the Health and Human Services appropriations bill preventing the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from using any of its $30.7 billion funds to "advocate or promote gun control."

"Rep. Denny Rehberg led the charge because, despite Congress' holding the line on Second Amendment rights, "the gun control special interest groups haven't gone away, they've just turned to the executive and judicial branches to erode our constitutional rights." [He said] "We know President Obama fundamentally opposes gun rights, so it's our job to keep a close eye on his administrative actions."

"... the NIH - the agency tasked with this mission - instead has wasted more than $5 million since 2002 in an effort to strengthen gun-control laws.

"... it isn't surprising that the Obama administration and their gun-control allies are now forced to find devious ways to build support for their gun bans and other items on their wish list," said Chris W. Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action.

"The ... agency researched whether adolescents treated for gunshot wounds were more likely to have consumed alcohol and carried a firearm during the period the injury occurred compared with victims of non-gun-related assaults. It took $2.6 million of taxpayers' money to find out what could have been assumed for free: that teenagers who possess illegal guns, engage in underage drinking and hang out with other ne'er-do-wells are more likely to get shot.

"... also wasted $2 million to determine if there is a causal relationship between gun violence and the presence of bars and liquor stores. The research was intended to prove the rate of homicides and suicides could be reduced with zoning regulations that kept out so-called "alcohol outlets."

"Another study spent $36,000 to try to prove that a home without firearms was essential to a child's safety and well-being. "They spent tens of thousands of dollars singling out the downside of gun ownership as part of their effort ...

"Mr. Obama's anti-gun beliefs have sparked a steady increase in firearm sales since he took office. "Better buy it now while I still can," millions are thinking. Americans who report having a gun in the home in the past year have risen from 41 percent to 47 percent, the highest ever recorded, according to Gallup.

"The feds, however, still have their sights on gun ownership. Thankfully, Congress has stopped the Obama administration from barreling ahead with its efforts to put a trigger lock on the will of the American people."

LINK: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/22/firing-back-at-gun-control/

Guamsst
12-30-2011, 06:33
"Another study spent $36,000 to try to prove that a home without firearms was essential to a child's safety and well-being. "They spent tens of thousands of dollars singling out the downside of gun ownership as part of their effort ...

Hmm, I bet the study did not consider the safety of the child during home invasion by murderers, kidnappers or pedophiles.

JB White
12-30-2011, 08:51
Hmm, I bet the study did not consider the safety of the child during home invasion by murderers, kidnappers or pedophiles.

In my best nasaly whining liberal voice, hand on hip and eyes rolling towards the ceiling: Oh c'mon now. Those things just don't happen enough in real life to be considered a real statistic. Besides, that's not the issue here.

How'd I do? Ready for prime time or needs more work?

Deano41
12-30-2011, 10:23
"Never quite as old as the other old farts"

Not bad for a "dinosaur" (I read your other post).
And, you don't have to be old to be an old fart, but in your case it's helped. :>)

Dan Shapiro
12-31-2011, 08:29
Can you imagine what that clown in the White House would do if he had 4 more years and no worries about being re-elected again?

DAVEB47
12-31-2011, 08:39
Can you imagine what that clown in the White House would do if he had 4 more years and no worries about being re-elected again?

Amen to that. Even if he loses, the 2 months he's still in office scare me.

JB White
12-31-2011, 12:10
"Never quite as old as the other old farts"

Not bad for a "dinosaur" (I read your other post).
And, you don't have to be old to be an old fart, but in your case it's helped. :>)

I'm not old. I'm mellowed and aged like fine bourbon! :)

Weasel
12-31-2011, 08:51
Better get ready for 4 more because the repubs are going to give it to him on a silver platter. You have to come up with all kinds of proof that your are a natural born citizen of this country for every thing but President of the United States. Go figure.