View Full Version : The inbred imbecile is at it again
Prince Charles is now calling for everybody to give up their cars.
Like I've said before, hundreds of years of inbreeding between the
royal families of Europe begets a mutant, aka Charles.
Presumably, he'll get rid of his Rolls Royce to set an example. [you suppose ?]
Story is on Drudge but the Daily Telegraph story [wasn't] available
That Bonnie Prince Charlie is several bricks short of a load. Look when he was married to Diana. He wouldn't sleep with her but snuck around and porked that Peelosi looking geek.
So anything he's got to say about what automobile I drive, is BS.
Bob - The Beagle Master
09-21-2009, 05:21
That the Tower of London is such a big tourist attraction. They should toss the prince in there for about 40 years or so. Those people just really need to go.:hello:
Ping Sr.
09-21-2009, 05:57
That Bonnie Prince Charlie is several bricks short of a load. Look when he was married to Diana. He wouldn't sleep with her but snuck around and porked that Peelosi looking geek.
So anything he's got to say about what automobile I drive, is BS.
As good an argument against his sanity as I've seen.:eusa_dance: His girlfriend did look sort of like a camel didnt she.
John Sukey
09-21-2009, 10:54
OK folks, back off. For one, he was dating the other woman BEFORE she was married and BEFORE he met Diana. Daddy broke them up.
Diana was far from the perfect princess, and in fact her entire family IS NOT what anyone would want for in-laws and she wasn't exactly the faithful wife.
The woman he is married to now is about the same age as he is, and their interests are the same. He should have married her FIRST in spite of his father's interference.
Further, Anyone remember WHY the Church of England was started? Sure, divorce among the royals is newsworthy, but thats only ONE of many divorces in the U.K. At least he didn;'t have Dianne's head chopped off like his ancestor did with his wives:eek:
Now take Charley's statement in context. England has an excellent transportation network and in most places you can get along without a car.
I do have to wonder how I would handle waiting for mum to die before I could get the job I was trained for all my life.
Edward VII was quite a hell raiser too, since he had to wait until Vicky kicked the bucket, but once he got the job, he turned out well.
Compared to what we have in congress and the White House, Charley aint half-bad
Why should he worry about cars? Doesn't he have a nice horse drawn carriage to ride in? Come on, Chuck, lead by example! BRING OUT THE HORSES! Don't accept another limo ride, and take a ship equipped with sails instead of a plane when going off the island.
Vern Humphrey
09-22-2009, 08:24
Charlie is often photographed wearing kilts. You may wonder why.
It's so people will look at his knobby knees instead of his jug-handle ears.;)
JDBoardman
09-22-2009, 02:10
Charles, Prince of Wales is NOT Bonnie Prince Charlie! That gentleman was Charles Edward Stuart, descendant of Mary and heir to the Throne of Scotland. His forces were defeated in 1746 by the Hanoveran usurpers under George II at the Battle of Culloden.
The jug-earded lug is the son of Elizabeth and her Cousin Phillip (sounds kinda like Arkansas, don't it?). Phillip was "adopted" by Lord Louis Mountbatten, and has about the IQ of a warm kidey pie.
John Sukey
09-22-2009, 02:28
Well Phil the Greek is not what one would call a perfect father.
Now if you want an example of inbreeding,anyone remember the "Hapsburg lip"
As for the original "Bonnie Prince Charlie, he was a DISASTER for Scotland.
But his girlfriend did introduce him to cross dressing so he could hop a boat to Skye.
Bob - The Beagle Master
09-22-2009, 03:05
They really need to be stuffed and put in a museum next to the passenger pigeon.
JB White
09-22-2009, 03:44
I don't give a rodents bum about any Royalty. My maternal Grandmother lived under Hapsburg rule and she didn't give a rodents bum either.
Ken The Kanuck
09-22-2009, 04:32
Being a little closer to the Royal family than you Yanks, I'll let you in on a internal story about Charles and Camilla.
You see ( and I got this from an inside source ) when Charles and Camilla were first married they spent thier wedding night in Buckingham Palace. Thier bedroom was right beside the King and Queen's and of course those old building were not built so well and the walls were a little thin and the King and Queen could hear everything.
Charles and Camilla retired for thier wedding night and Camilla asked Charles to help her off with her shoes. Naturally it had been a long day and from all the standing around her feet had swollen up considerably. Soon Charles had worked up quite a sweat trying to pull and push the shoe off. Camilla was in alot of discomfort and was moaning and crying out " Oh Charles please be gentle, it hurts, it hurts ". Charles now was becoming quite fustrated himself and called out " Damn it, it's so tight ".
The Queen listening in the next room turned to her husband and said " see I told you she was a virgin".
Finally the shoe popped off and there was a terrific yell of relief from both Camilla and Charles. Then Charles says " Okay, now the other one ".
Again there was a great ruckus and commotion with Charles yelling out " this one is even tighter than the other one".
The King turns to the Queen and says " see I told you, once a Navy man, always a Navy man ".
KTK:eusa_dance:
That reminds me:
When Charles married Diana, being somewhat lamebrained, he went
to his father, the Duke, for some first night advice.
The Duke explained the royal protocol:
"She'll say, I offer my honour
You will reply: I honour your offer,
and if she's anything like the Queen, you'll be on her and off her all night long"
Bob - The Beagle Master
09-22-2009, 08:16
Did that really happen?
John Sukey
09-23-2009, 09:59
Well for all the jokes, keep in mind that the monarchy is the BRITISH system, NOT ours. And most of the folks in England want to keep it.
You had best not make nasty remarks about the Queen to a Brit if you want to stay healthy.
Though i have a sneaking suspicion that if Guy Fawkes were around today, he would recieve at least an OBE for blowing up the PRATTS in parliament.
JB White
09-23-2009, 10:06
Speaking of Guy, do they still burn him? I recall princess Tony calling for a ban when the effigies looked like him instead.
Hey John,
I've made it known many times that I'm a Brit. Ex British army. Been in California since 63.
I guess that allows me some latitude when it comes to Queen jokes.
The one criticism I have of the Queen is that she refused to allow
Princess Margaret to marry Group Captain Townsend because he was a commoner.
Margaret led a very unhappy life because of that, and she
was the nicest person. To add insult to injury, she was then forced to marry
Lord Snowden, renowned for being permanently flaccid.
Vern Humphrey
09-23-2009, 03:49
Well for all the jokes, keep in mind that the monarchy is the BRITISH system, NOT ours. And most of the folks in England want to keep it.
You're right, John. But let him keep this sort of nonsense on his side of the pond.
If history is any guide, our own leftists will take this as a cue to start pushing the same dreck here.
You had best not make nasty remarks about the Queen to a Brit if you want to stay healthy.
Don't have to -- there are plenty of Brits who will make those nasty remarks for you.;)
Though i have a sneaking suspicion that if Guy Fawkes were around today, he would recieve at least an OBE for blowing up the PRATTS in parliament.
And find plenty of people willing to help him carry the gunpowder into the building.
John Sukey
09-23-2009, 08:30
If it was a choice, I would take Charley over Biden. (both have to wait for the top job);)
Now given how long Charley's grandmother lived, His mother may out last him;)
Bob - The Beagle Master
09-24-2009, 03:51
Oh Bullsh!t Edith? Do you just have too much time on your hands John? How do you keep track of all the Brit crap and why do you bother? I can give you the final answer here John. The will inbreed themselves into insane asylums in about 2 more generations and the last one will be Simon The Drooler.
John Sukey
09-24-2009, 09:58
to answer your question;
I have collected British and Commonwealth rifles, uniforms, badges, prints, and books for many years. At one time I was a member of a reenactment group portraying the 92nd foot.
I have several good friends in the U.K.
Regardless of your opinion of the royals, it's THEIR SYSTEM, NOT OURS.
I really do not understand your "inbred" statement.
Bob - The Beagle Master
09-24-2009, 01:26
I just really don't think that all of their scandals and the amount of wealth that they waste merits any respect. They never owned any more of England than you or I owned, it's just that their ancestors did.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.2 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.