Turner Slings
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Army may get new sniper rifle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    1,447

    Default Army may get new sniper rifle

    Spam Sniper- one click, one kill.

    CSP is what you make it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,885

    Default

    It does not say anything about a new cartridge so will it be just a new loading of the 7.62 MM round. maybe 187gr MHPBT?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    495

    Default

    Johnny, I think they said it's gonna be in .300 Win Mag., which is a logical choice for them....

    Imagine if they adopt his rifle system, and the CMP gets all those old, obsolete M40's & M24's......Wow...better start saving.......Hey, you never know, right...
    Last edited by Dan in NY; 04-17-2011 at 05:31.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,885

    Default

    That would be cool but I thought the article said that Remington Rebuild the M24 into the new version I will reread it. I missed the 300 WinMag sentence. I thought the .338 Lapua Mag. was going to be the replacement for the .50 cal. and the 7.62 MM
    Last edited by Johnny in Texas; 04-17-2011 at 07:07.

  5. #5

    Default

    The XM2010 is a done deal, Upgraded M24's, New Barrel (.300 WM) New bolt, New scope (Leupold & Stevens new 34 mm scope design) New Stock, designed by Cadex for Remington, Scope rings by Badger Ordnance, the suppressor is the AAC Titanium Titan. the first rifles were in Tan, the balance will be Black. The rifle has a 10 round detachable box magazine.

    Remington is doing the upgrade, re-barrel, re-finish and assembly, the stocks are being supplied by 2 different contractors.

    Over 100 have been delivered already.

    Marty
    Badger Ordnance

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,885

    Default

    I did not realize the M24 was a long action receiver.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Norhteastern PA
    Posts
    2,451

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny in Texas View Post
    I did not realize the M24 was a long action receiver.
    Depending on who you believe, the LA was for use with a "to be developed later" .30-06 loading or for possible later use of the .300WM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,885

    Default

    I built a 7.62 sniper rifle on a M70 LA and it is easier to load and shoot quickly than my Rem. 7.62 PSS

  9. #9

    Default

    According to Army records and the Lead Engineer at Remington the M24 was built on a long action so it could be upgraded to a .300 WM. this is a documented fact.

    Marty
    Badger Ordnance

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Norhteastern PA
    Posts
    2,451

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badgerord View Post
    According to Army records and the Lead Engineer at Remington the M24 was built on a long action so it could be upgraded to a .300 WM. this is a documented fact.

    Marty
    Badger Ordnance
    And yet, MAJ Mende maintains that the LA was for the eventual use of high power load for the .30-06 that would be developed. At the time there was .30-06 ammo in the military system. I'm not arguing, just stating that there are people who make different statements about the LA.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts