Dean's Gun Restoration
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: M1 carbine paratrooper ser no ranges

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    1,038

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phil441 View Post
    Really great pictures!
    Could you possibly get a few more of the butt plate?
    Thanks
    You just can't really see anything. I compared it to mine which is a 6.3 million paratrooper and it looks identical in everyway. Except you can see the numbers better in mine. But here are some more pics, but you can't really see anything.





    Last edited by cplnorton; 04-18-2012 at 01:06.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    208

    Default

    While the 6,74x,xxx with the 1-45 dated barrel is an M1A1 because it is in the M1A1 configuration, i.e. folding stock , it isn't an original M1A1. That is, it didn't leave Inland in that configuration.

    Inland's last delivery of M1A1s was in December of 1944 and they hadn't gotten to the 6.7 mil range by then.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Central Texas
    Posts
    1,368

    Default

    "You just can't really see anything. I compared it to mine which is a 6.3 million paratrooper and it looks identical in everyway. Except you can see the numbers better in mine."

    That's what I was curious about.
    Many Thanks!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,195

    Default

    Yup a reproduction stock for sure.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    1,038

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuna View Post
    Yup a reproduction stock for sure.
    Are you sure? How do you tell?

    My friend will be heartbroken. He's had it forever.
    Last edited by cplnorton; 04-18-2012 at 09:13.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    175

    Default

    Different casting position denotes the last number. Both of mine have the same number, 9. Oh well, at least I have two.


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    1,038

    Default

    I was hoping Tuna would have jumped back on by now. But what does everyone else think? It appears correct to me. But maybe you guys see something I don't.

    Thanks!

    Steve

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,847

    Default

    The butt plate looks like it has some markings just washed out try a shot from about 2 to 3 foot away. The stock does not look fake to me. You can see the numbers in the first pics you posted. You guy's are correct 6.7 is too late, I have a 6,66X,XXX that has a 12-44 barrel Hand stamped M1 but I am not sure when it MFG'ed.
    Last edited by Johnny in Texas; 04-20-2012 at 03:34.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,195

    Default

    I should have said the butt plate doesn't look like it's a real one. Compare the picture of yours to the pictures that Jim posted. You cannot see the part number,the wagon wheel or the casting mold number. All of these are on a real Inland butt plate.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    1,038

    Default

    I have been trying to get a pic, but you just really can't see it in a pic. But if I take it and put in a dark room and put a flashhlight on it, you can see the number and the wagon wheel. So I think it's legit, just a poor casting of it.

    Have you guys seen a lot before like that?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts