Dean's Gun Restoration
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Anyone think it's a real M14?

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oceanside, Ca
    Posts
    3,410

    Default

    "...orginal Banett, 4 clips,...."

    Wonder if he meant original bayonet, 4 magazines - given those errors, ya it' could be an M1A. And that's giving him the benefit of the doubt. More than likely it could be an M1.
    Last edited by Dan Shapiro; 04-23-2012 at 06:48.
    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    1,043

    Default

    There were some early receivers built by different companies that were stamped M14. He might have one of those and he's confused.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Who were the companies that stamped there commercial receivers "M14" ? Thanks

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    1,043

    Default

    Armscorp, early Smith (before smith enterprises), and Fulton Armory all did I believe.

    I think even some polytechs were marked M14. And I think some of the new receiver comapanies are marking their's M14 as well.

    There also was some TRW's national matches that were made as semi auto only that made it out into the public as well. But they are very, very hard to find.

    One of them was actually confiscated by the ATF years ago, but the owner fought fought for it and won. He actually got his rifle back as the ATF had to admit it was manufactured as a semi only to begin with. And it had never been a machine gun, so the once a machine gun, always a machine gun law didn't apply. It was a case in Ohio and as far as I know he still owns it.

    There are also some real M14's that were rewelds by HAHN and Pearl, who rewelded them back in the day and sold them legallly. They are legal to own today. Then there are ones who were rewelded by MKS that were all confiscated by the ATF, but some were never found.

    And then there are just real M14's that leaked out from state organizations over the years.

    It really could be a lot of options.
    Last edited by cplnorton; 04-24-2012 at 06:55.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South West Virginia
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Fulton still marks them M14.
    "In God We Trust"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elliston, Ohio
    Posts
    2,182

    Default

    To answer the OP....NO!, it isn't "real"! "M1-A" is a registered trademark of Springfield Inc also known as The Fratelli-Reese Gang and is only correctly and legally applied to rifles of their manufacture. Everything else is an M14-S or M14-SA and is marked accordingly.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    1,470

    Default

    Lee Emerson recently informed me that SAinc. never got the term "M1A" trademarked, though they tiried for years to do it, but were turned down in the 90's. So the term may be legally applied to any semi auto M14 type rifle.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi
    Posts
    2,963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Todd1035 View Post
    Who were the companies that stamped there commercial receivers "M14" ? Thanks
    Phillip McGregor (OFC)
    "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Summerfield Florida
    Posts
    313

    Default

    The price answers the question.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts