Turner Slings
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Naval Trainer Rifle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    138

    Default Naval Trainer Rifle

    Here is an interesting Naval Trainer I picked up today. A couple of things that are intersting is the low # serial number ( 5) , and that so many parts are numbered to the receiver. I had heard these were rushed out, and they often skipped serializing the parts. Also found out that the cleaning rod is faux rod. It is only about 2 inches long. I thought I might have broken the cleaning rod so I look down the channel, and it was only about 1 1/2" deep.

    Thanks
    Pat
    Attached Images

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Baird, Texas
    Posts
    6,908

    Default

    I have one, mine is almost relic condeition though with coat hanger holding a couple of pieces on. The Naval trainers are not easy to find. You seem to have found a great one.
    I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guamsst View Post
    I have one, mine is almost relic condeition though with coat hanger holding a couple of pieces on. The Naval trainers are not easy to find. You seem to have found a great one.
    Thanks, now I have to find someone who can translate it ! From what I have been reading, the one marking should be some sort of warning, and the other possibly the name of the instruction school.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Baird, Texas
    Posts
    6,908

    Default

    White paint should be 384.... hard to tell as it looks like half the 8 is missing so could be a different charachter. Rectangle basically says "blank ammunition only". Circle is most likely the school or unit it belonged to, such as Sasebo base or some other naval base, or as simple as Band or Cavalry or whatever. I am going off rumor and guesses on the circle as I have never gotten one translated. I will try to get my buddy to translate it later.

    Don't expect a strict translation. I have a type 38 that has been independently translated twice. Once by a Japanese man with a degree in ancient Japanese literature, the other by a retired Marine who was a Japanese linguist. Both translations of the stock cartouche were repeated as "Big Japanese Teeth" Head scratching and a look of confusion accompanied both translations.
    I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guamsst View Post
    White paint should be 384.... hard to tell as it looks like half the 8 is missing so could be a different charachter. Rectangle basically says "blank ammunition only". Circle is most likely the school or unit it belonged to, such as Sasebo base or some other naval base, or as simple as Band or Cavalry or whatever. I am going off rumor and guesses on the circle as I have never gotten one translated. I will try to get my buddy to translate it later.

    Don't expect a strict translation. I have a type 38 that has been independently translated twice. Once by a Japanese man with a degree in ancient Japanese literature, the other by a retired Marine who was a Japanese linguist. Both translations of the stock cartouche were repeated as "Big Japanese Teeth" Head scratching and a look of confusion accompanied both translations.
    Thanks - I went over to the Banzai forum and think I found (except for the white lettering) and almost exact match for the stock markings. They have it translated there as:

    "Jippo - No - Hassha - Wo - Kinzu" - Discharging of Live Cartridges Is Prohibited The large circled character reads "Kyo" - Education.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,451

    Default

    Considering that the reciever was made of pot metal, that was good advice
    If memory serves, I believe the trainers had a one piece reciever tang while real rifles had a two piece one.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Baird, Texas
    Posts
    6,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Sukey View Post
    Considering that the reciever was made of pot metal, that was good advice
    If memory serves, I believe the trainers had a one piece reciever tang while real rifles had a two piece one.
    I think it depends on who made it as to how it was constructed. As to the receivers, I have one of the ones from "Nippon Special Steel" company. Apparently on this one, the steel is "special" because it is crap...LOL

    Oh and good luck researching Japanese companies. Seems all of them went out of business between 1936-1945 and many had name changes around 1946....odd...LOL

    Atleast Mitsubishi didn't change any really. Same emblem, same name.
    Last edited by Guamsst; 06-21-2012 at 07:26.
    I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Sukey View Post
    Considering that the reciever was made of pot metal, that was good advice
    If memory serves, I believe the trainers had a one piece reciever tang while real rifles had a two piece one.
    Mine is a one piece receiver tang.

    Thanks,
    Pat

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts