Turner Slings
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: My NPM M1Carbine (pic heavy) opinions welcome!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    208

    Default

    Yes, after about the 50,xxx - 55,xxx or so serial number range Inland receivers have two notches.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Central Texas
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amber View Post
    Are my old eyes, late at night seeing welding on the receiver?
    If you're seeing what I saw in the lower left of the last two posted pictures, yeah, I saw them too. The gurus say we're wrong..........
    So we must be mistaken...........?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phil441 View Post
    If you're seeing what I saw in the lower left of the last two posted pictures, yeah, I saw them too. The gurus say we're wrong..........
    So we must be mistaken...........?
    The discoloration towards the "top" of the receiver? It's varnish that someone applied to the old springfield stock at some point. It was everywhere. I have been cleaning it off, little by little.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianQ View Post
    Serial numbers were applied toward the end of the receiver manufacturing process. If a receiver was completed enough for Inland to apply the serial number before being transferred to another manufacturer it would easily be identifiable as an Inland made receiver. However, the receiver shows none of the Inland receiver features and all the NPM features. The font in the serial number is not the style Inland used in the 5 million block either. The forward receiver markings match NPM markings which as you might have guessed differ from Inland's.
    I am coming to this conclusion as well. Everything is standard NPM,..... except that serial number. I'm at a bit of a loss, if this has never been an issue before. Heck, maybe the "5" stamp is a factory mistake? I would be interested to see an inland with a serial number close to this one, just to try and look at this from another angle.
    Last edited by Jimbo302; 06-20-2012 at 09:31.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phil441 View Post
    If you're seeing what I saw in the lower left of the last two posted pictures, yeah, I saw them too. The gurus say we're wrong..........
    So we must be mistaken...........?
    Yes Phil, that is the area I was seeing. In addition to the discoloration, I see what looks like welding slag in a couple of other areas. But even if it's been welded, it wouldn't account for the mis-match of the s/n & manufacturer's name.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amber View Post
    Yes Phil, that is the area I was seeing. In addition to the discoloration, I see what looks like welding slag in a couple of other areas. But even if it's been welded, it wouldn't account for the mis-match of the s/n & manufacturer's name.
    Are my posts invisible? Which picture/areas? I am not seeing anything in the last two. I'll try and get a closer look for clarification.
    Last edited by Jimbo302; 06-21-2012 at 11:00.

  7. #27

    Default

    Just throwing this out there. Any chance its a Winchester serial numbered reciever? They have some blocks of numbers that one book I have shows close to this but the block listed is incomplete in the book. It only shows ending numbers and no beginning in this range? Just a thought otherwise I surely do not know..Does not look like their font however.
    Last edited by carbineone1964; 06-25-2012 at 12:03.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts