Turner Slings
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 400,000 Troops in the USA? To Fight Whom?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    20

    Default 400,000 Troops in the USA? To Fight Whom?

    I didn't even think our troop levels were at 400,000 total during this state of declining enlistment and budget slashes. Why is it that they want to garrison the USA? At this point, with the authority already given the President and the SecDef, they can issue this order with the stroke of a pen.

    See the article below by Matthew Rothschild in The Progressive, 12 Aug 09

    http://www.progressive.org/wx081209b.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    One might also ask why there were ads on the Army website looking for internment specialists. I checked, it was there.

    Why is National Guard recruiting for 'internment' cops?
    Ad campaign seeks workers at 'civilian resettlement facility'


    Posted: August 07, 2009
    11:45 pm Eastern



    By Bob Unruh
    © 2009 WorldNetDaily
    An [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]ad [COLOR=blue !important]campaign[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

    featured on a U.S. Army website seeking those who would be interested in being an "Internment/Resettlement" specialist is raising alarms across the country, generating concerns that there is some truth in those theories about domestic detention camps, a roundup of dissidents and a crackdown on "threatening" conservatives.
    Are you an enemy of the state? Get the bumper sticker that lets everyone know you have no apologies for being right!
    The ads, at the GoArmy.com website as well as others including Monster.com, cite the need for:
    "Internment/Resettlement (I/R) Specialists in the Army are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility. I/R Specialists provide rehabilitative, health, welfare, and [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]security[/COLOR][/COLOR] to U.S. military prisoners within a confinement or correctional facility; conduct inspections; prepare written reports; and coordinate activities of prisoners/internees and staff personnel.
    The campaign follows by only weeks a report from the U.S. Department of [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]Homeland [COLOR=blue !important]Security[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] warning about "right-wing extremists" who could pose a danger to the country – including those who support third-party political candidates, oppose abortion and would prefer to have the U.S. [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]immigration [COLOR=blue !important]laws[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] already on the books enforced.

    The rest of the article here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106304
    Pat - OFC

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,431

    Default

    Well lets see. Call out the reserves?
    First they are going to have to equip them.
    Now how many of those folks in the reserves are still in the same physical condition as when they left the service?
    How many have moved?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    San Clemente, Ca Within earshot of the sound of freedom from Camp Pendleton
    Posts
    748

    Default

    I don't normally adhere to some of the views of the "black helicopter" folks. But a "civilian internment specialist"? We haven't had internment camps since 1942! Does this go along with the need for a "Civilian defense force as strong as our military"?

    Dean (the other one)
    OFC-Orange Co., Ca. Chapter

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    ST. LOUIS, MO.
    Posts
    4,999

    Wink

    Boy if it isn't one thing it's six! They must have heard that Bob has access to a helo, and the rest of us are crazed veterans and real Americans! Well we all know we can't have people like that in the rear of the radical left to disrupt their communications and debunk their lies!

    Now the question becomes "what are we prepared to do?" I don't look my best in a camp, so I guess I shall have to give it the "Red Dawn" special and head for the woods.

    I am counting on the Oath Keepers to be at my side if and when it becomes necessary. Well I doubt they will ever get an American to fire on a lawfully American exercising his rights anyway so the point (I hope) is moot!
    tford (VSM-OFC)
    "The heart of the wise inclines to the right but the heart of the fool to the left." Eccleiastes 10:2

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    Well, if you think our soldiers won't fire on Americans, that could explain why so many are overseas while exercises are run in this country with foreign troops. (Oops! Is my tinfoil hat showing again?)

    What about the mercenaries? I suspect most of them would fire on Americans or anyone else they are paid to fire on.
    Pat - OFC

  7. #7

    Default Resevists

    You all are starting to scare me. First of all, the Army's combined numbers (AD,NG,AR) equal at least 8-900,00 Soldiers, the vast majority are already here in the states.. Secondly, The Army has repeatedly met it's recruiting goals during the war on terror. Third, the reserve and NG of today are not the same as you might remember, They are as much a part of our overseas effort as us AD folks. They are pretty much active duty since 9/11. Lastly, The Army has always had internment specialists, they are called Jailers. Also the Army is also made up of free thinking Americans that know wright from wrong.
    Take off the tinfoil hats guys and think things through.
    Amorkav

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Central MO
    Posts
    2,943

    Default I agree with Armorkav... somewhat.

    My next door neighbor's kid volunteered for the USMC and went to boot camp last March. He is now an MP and is training for duties that will including guarding prisoners. Apparently he is getting a lot of training about how to handle Islamic type POW's.

    I am not much concerned about the Army or Marine Corps being turned loose on the civilian population. I think this whole thing is about as credible as the Super Highway and the Amero currency replacing the dollar. It just ain't happening.

    Hey Pat, where is that road anyway?
    How come it is always too something... Too hot, too cold, too soon, too late, too much, too little, too deep, too shallow, but always "too" something.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    900

    Default

    I left service in 06, now I know that a lot has changed but at that time the focus was on fighting overseas. We had our hands full trying to fight islamic terrorists than worry about domestic civil unrest. I have to think that if that was what was being instructed that people who recieved it would see it as wrong and be saying things to others.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northern by birth, transplanted to Free America by the grace of God
    Posts
    458

    Default

    I just dont see Americans being sudjugated by their government by direct force of arms. Even if only one in 50 gun owners would respond with like force, Uncle Scratch would have a hell of a mess on their hands. At least 8-10 guys at the club are active or retired Guard members, and we're all NRA. I just dont see it happening. Our idiot government couldnt even get riot ammo distributed to troops when gang bangers, welfare queens, and illegal aliens were tearing LA apart after the Rodney King verdict. Most gun owners have learned to keep a healthy reserve of "primary caliber" ammunition.

    No, complacency at the voting booth is the biggest threat.
    Last edited by kragnut; 09-08-2009 at 04:29.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 30 carbine vs Chicom troops
    By jim c 351 in forum M1 Carbine Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 10-10-2009, 12:03
  2. India Air: Fist fight breaks out among cockpit flight crew!
    By tford (OFC) in forum Second Amendment and Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2009, 08:02
  3. obama's reluctance to send troops to Afghanistan
    By dogtag in forum Second Amendment and Politics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-02-2009, 06:07
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-26-2009, 09:07
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2009, 01:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts