| Do you REALLY
know the difference between a pistol and a revolver?
by Dick Culver
What would you say if someone told you that
Harry Callahan carried a .44 Magnum pistol, instead of a Model 29 S&W Revolver?
Well, in fact the individual would be technically correct. The distinction between pistols
and revolvers has become somewhat blurred over the years, and folks who should know
better sometimes allow slang and colloquial usage color their understanding of the English
Language. In order to more clearly define "whats what" in the handgun
world, we need to go back to our beginnings.
Prior to the invention of
repeating handguns, all firearms designed to be used with one hand were properly referred
to as pistols. For a variety, you had "matchlock" pistols,
flintlock pistols, and percussion pistols, all designed to be easily carried
and capable of being fired with one hand. Sam Colts invention (if you dont
count the Collier), gave us a "repeating pistol", more correctly called a
"revolving pistol", usually called a revolver for short.
The invention of the
"self-loading pistol" further complicated the distinction, but everything
still followed as you would expect. We now had pistols designed to be fired with one hand
that commonly became known as "automatics", but this of course, was simply a
contraction of "semi-automatic pistol". We even have a couple of full
automatic pistols if you count some foreign variations of the 1911 design, the
Glock 18, and the Model 712 Broom-handle Mauser.
How about a semi-automatic
revolving pistol? Yep, there is/was such a thing, built by Webley Fosbury in
England (in several models, actually). The top end of pistol containing the cylinder was
designed to move to the rear on "rails" like the slide on a .45. The recoil
produced by firing the cartridge, caused the top end to travel to the rear cocking the
hammer. A stationary vertical pin in the lower frame tracked in a "zigzag"
channel in the cylinder causing it to turn to the next chamber as the top end moved
rearward. The first time I read "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" I
thought the author had really blown his stack
alas, twas I that was wrong, the
lad had described an existing pistol.
Much of the confusion of the
terminology came about years ago, when the Army put out their manual on "Pistols
and Revolvers". They were of course, incorrect in their nomenclature, the
manual should have been named simply "Pistols".
Lets sum this thing up
before it gets out of hand like the "Gnu" jokes. First of all, any handgun can
be described with the word "pistol", but all can be "sub-categorized"
as follows:
Pistol = Any firearm designed to be fired with
one hand (yeah, I know, everyone uses two hands these days, but here were talking
definitions).
Sub
categories:
Single Shot Pistols (Black
Powder or Cartridge)
Revolving Pistols (black powder or
cartridge)
Semi-Automatic Pistols (gas, recoil and
blowback)
Semi-Automatic Revolving Pistols (Webley
Fosbury)
(Full) Automatic Pistols (usually rare
variations of existing semi-automatic pistols)
If you really
want to spice up the conversation, you can even talk about what makes a revolving pistol
work, as in "single action revolving pistols", "double action
revolving pistols", "double action only revolving pistols",
etc., but here were getting more properly into nomenclature instead of definition.
At any rate, the next
time someone starts talking about pistols and revolvers, you
can smile and know that they are using two words to describe the same object
Just
keep in mind that all revolvers are pistols, but
not all pistols
are revolvers (and if one smart cookie mentions that I am
technically wrong and cites the example of the Colts Revolving Rifle, Id have
to admit that he has just mentioned the exception that proves the rule!).
Ill forgive you if you
wanna call your ol Granpappys single action a "thumbuster",
"cutter", "smoke pole", "plow handle", or "hawg
leg", but never forget Clint Eastwoods quote in "The Outlaw Josey
Wales"
Ol Josey says "well, ya gonna pull
them pistols, or whistle Dixie?"
Now,
Josey knew his nomenclature!
|